Select your state below to see how AxisCare provides an EVV solution for your home care agency.

Disclaimer: As many states are still deciding on their EVV vendor model, we are closely monitoring their decisions and will attempt to keep this page as updated as possible. However, this page may or may not reflect the latest news, so please reference your state’s medicaid site for official information and updates.
AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY DC

Supported: PENDING

Payers in Alabama have selected HHAeXchange and AxisCare is waiting on the final specifications to be released to complete the necessary development. We expect to be fully compliant soon according to state’s timeline.

Alabama Medicaid Information

Supported: NOT AT THIS TIME

Alaska has chosen a closed model where AxisCare is currently not able to provide EVV data to the state.

ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES

Supported: YES

AxisCare meets the state ‘s EVV requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management solution. We have also developed an integration with Sandata, Arizona’s chosen vendor, which will allow agencies to send specific visit information directly to Sandata, if needed.

AHCCCS EVV Update

Supported: YES

AxisCare meets state EVV requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management solution. We have also developed integrations with HHAeXchange, AuthentiCare, and CareBridge, Arkansas’ contracted vendors, which will allow agencies to send specific visit information directly to those aggregators.

Arkansas EVV Update [Webinar]

Supported: PENDING

Payers in California have selected Sandata and AxisCare is waiting on the final specifications to be released to complete the necessary development. We expect to be fully compliant soon according to California’s timeline.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES

Supported: YES

Colorado has chosen to implement an open vendor model in which the state selects a single vendor (in this case, Sandata Technologies) while allowing providers and MCOs to continue using their existing EVV systems as long as it meets federal EVV guidelines.

AxisCare meets state EVV requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management solution. We have also developed an integration with Sandata, Colorado’s contracted vendor, which will allow agencies to send specific visit information directly to Sandata, if needed.

Colorado EVV Information

Supported: NOT AT THIS TIME

Connecticut has chosen a closed model where AxisCare is currently not able to provide EVV data to the state.

CONNECTICUT EVV INFORMATION

Supported: YES

Delaware has not yet chosen an EVV aggregator. AxisCare is actively monitoring their decision and will provide updates as they are available.

DELAWARE EVV INFORMATION

Supported: YES

AxisCare currently provides direct integration with HHAeXchange and Tellus, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management solution.

Florida’s Agency for Health Care Administration

Supported: YES

Georgia has chosen to use an open vendor model in which the state sets the standards for EVV, and providers may either use their existing EVV system or choose one that best meets their needs.

AxisCare has developed a direct integration with Tellus, Georgia’s EVV aggregator, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management solution.

Georgia Department of Community Health

Supported: YES

Hawaii has chosen to implement an open vendor model in which the state selects a single vendor (in this case, Sandata Technologies) while allowing providers and MCOs to continue using their existing EVV systems as long as it meets federal EVV guidelines.

AxisCare meets state EVV requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management solution. We have also developed an integration with Sandata, Hawaii’s contracted vendor, which will allow agencies to send specific visit information directly to Sandata, if needed.

Med-QUEST Division (MQD) Update

Supported: YES

Idaho has chosen to implement an open vendor model in which the state selects a single vendor (in this case, Sandata Technologies) while allowing providers and MCOs to continue using their existing EVV systems as long as it meets federal EVV guidelines.

AxisCare meets state EVV requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management solution. We have also developed an integration with Sandata, Idaho’s contracted vendor, which will allow agencies to send specific visit information directly to Sandata, if needed.

Idaho Department of Health and Welfare

Supported: YES

Illinois has chosen to implement an open vendor model in which the state selects a single vendor (in this case, Sandata Technologies) while allowing providers and MCOs to continue using their existing EVV systems as long as it meets federal EVV guidelines.

AxisCare meets state EVV requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management solution. We have also developed an integration with Sandata, Illinois’s contracted vendor, which will allow agencies to send specific visit information directly to Sandata, if needed.

Illinois Department of Human Services

Supported: YES

Indiana has chosen to implement an open vendor model in which the state selects a single vendor (in this case, Sandata Technologies) while allowing providers and MCOs to continue using their existing EVV systems as long as it meets federal EVV guidelines.

AxisCare meets state EVV requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management solution. We have also developed an integration with Sandata, Indiana’s contracted vendor, which will allow agencies to send specific visit information directly to Sandata, if needed.

Indiana Medicaid Website

Supported: YES

Iowa has chosen to implement an open vendor model in which the state selects a single vendor (in this case, CareBride) while allowing providers and MCOs to continue using their existing EVV systems as long as it meets federal EVV guidelines.

AxisCare meets state EVV requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management solution. We have also developed an integration with CareBridge, Iowa’s contracted vendor, which will allow agencies to send specific visit information directly to CareBridge, if needed.

Iowa Department of Human Services – EVV

Supported: NOT AT THIS TIME

Kansas has chosen a closed model where AxisCare is currently not able to provide EVV data to the state.

KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT

Supported: NOT AT THIS TIME (NO REQUESTS)

The state of Kentucky has chosen Tellus/Netsmart as their EVV aggregator. AxisCare is considering an integration with Tellus/Netsmart in Kentucky barring sufficient demand from agencies in the state.

MEDICAID SERVICES

Supported: NOT AT THIS TIME (INSUFFICIENT DEMAND)

Louisiana has chosen an open model in which the state sets the standards for EVV, and providers and MCOs may either use their existing EVV system or choose one that best meets their needs. The state utilizes a vendor-agnostic aggregator system called Louisiana Service Reporting System (LaSRS) to take in data from all EVV systems.

AxisCare meets all mandated system requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management system.

LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH – EVV

Supported: YES

Maine has chosen to implement an open vendor model in which the state selects a single vendor (in this case, Sandata Technologies) while allowing providers to continue using their existing EVV systems as long as it meets federal EVV guidelines.

AxisCare meets state EVV requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management solution. We have also developed an integration with Sandata, Maine’s contracted vendor, which will allow agencies to send specific visit information directly to Sandata, if needed.

Maine Department of Health and Human Services – EVV

Supported: UNDETERMINED

Maryland operates a state-mandated in-house EVV model in which the state develops, operates, and manages its own EVV system. Maryland has chosen a Closed Model, mandating their state tracking system, LTSSMaryland. AxisCare is currently investigating an integration with the chosen vendor and will continue to post updates here.

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

Supported: YES

Massachusetts has chosen an Open Model but has recently decided not to use their initial aggregator, Optum.

We are actively monitoring Massachusett’s decision and will post updates here as they become available.

MASSHEALTH – LETTER TO PCAS

Supported: YES

The Michigan Department of Health and Human Services has decided to go with an Open Model that allows providers to choose their own EVV system, as long as it meets federal EVV regulations. They are in the process of choosing an aggregator system that will accept data from all EVV systems.

AxisCare meets all state and federal EVV requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management system.

Michigan Department of Health and Human Services – EVV

Supported: PENDING

Payers in Minnesota have selected HHAeXchange and AxisCare is waiting on the final specifications to be released to complete the necessary development. We expect to be fully compliant soon according to state’s timeline.

MN Department of Human Services: Electronic Service Delivery Documentation

Supported: UNDETERMINED

Mississippi has not yet determined its EVV model. AxisCare is tracking its decision and will continue to post updates here.

Mississippi Medicaid

Supported: YES

AxisCare meets the state’s EVV requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management solution. We have also developed an integration with Sandata, Missouri’s chosen vendor, which will allow agencies to send specific visit information directly to Sandata, if needed.

Missouri Department of Social Services – EVV

Supported: YES

Montana has opted to pursue an open vendor model, allowing personal care providers to select the EVV vendor which best suits their needs, or to continue to utilize their existing system. They are in the process of choosing an aggregator system that will accept data from all EVV systems.

AxisCare meets all state requirements as an EVV vendor, so current users can continue using AxisCare as their EVV solution.

Montana Medicaid

Supported: YES

AxisCare meets the state’s EVV requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management solution. We have also developed an integration with Tellus, Nebraska’s chosen vendor, which will allow agencies to send specific visit information directly to Tellus, if needed.

Nebraska Department of Health & Human Services

Supported: NOT AT THIS TIME (INSUFFICIENT DEMAND)

Nevada has implemented an open vendor model in which the state selects a single vendor while allowing providers to continue using their existing EVV systems as long as it meets federal EVV guidelines. Nevada has chosen AuthentiCare as its EVV aggregator.

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES – EVV

Supported: YES

New Hampshire has decided to go with an Open Model that allows providers to choose their own EVV system, as long as it meets federal EVV regulations. They are in the process of choosing an aggregator system that will accept data from all EVV systems.

AxisCare meets all state and federal EVV requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management system.

New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services

Supported: YES

New Jersey has implemented an open model in which the state sets the standards for EVV, and providers may either use their existing EVV system or choose one that best meets their needs.

AxisCare meets state EVV requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management solution. We have also integrated with HHAeXchange and Care Bridge, New Jersey’s two EVV aggregators, which will allow agencies to send specific visit information directly into their systems.

Supported: UNDETERMINED

New Mexico has chosen a closed model in which the state requires all providers to use a specific EVV system. We are currently investigating an integration with the chosen vendor, AuthentiCare. More information coming soon.

Supported: YES

New York has implemented an open vendor model in which the state selects a single vendor while allowing providers to continue using their existing EVV systems as long as it meets federal EVV guidelines.

New York has chosen to work with the following EVV aggregators: eMedNY, HHAeXchange, and CareBridge

AxisCare meets state EVV requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management solution. We have built an integration with eMedNY, in addition to currently being in the process of finalizing integrations with HHAeXchange and CareBridge so that agencies can send specific visit information directly to their systems.

Office of the Medicaid Inspector General

Supported: YES

North Carolina has implemented an open model in which the state sets the standards for EVV, and providers and MCOs may either use their existing EVV system or choose one that best meets their needs.

AxisCare meets state EVV requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management solution. We have also integrated with Sandata, HHAeXchange, and CareBridge, North Carolina’s EVV aggregators.

NC Medicaid Division of Health Benefits

Supported: NOT AT THIS TIME (INSUFFICIENT DEMAND)
North Dakota has chosen Sandata Technologies, LLC as their statewide Electronic Visit Verification (EVV) vendor.

We are not integrating with North Dakota’s aggregator at this time as we have not received any integration requests. If you are a North Dakota agency in need of this integration, please contact us as soon as possible.

NORTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES

Supported: YES

Ohio has chosen to implement an open vendor model in which the state selects a single vendor (in this case, SanData Technologies) while allowing providers to continue using their existing EVV systems as long as it meets federal EVV guidelines.

AxisCare meets state EVV requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management solution. We have also developed an integration with Sandata, Ohio’s contracted vendor, which will allow agencies to send specific visit information directly to SanData, if needed.

 

Ohio Provider Resource Association EVV Information

Supported: NOT AT THIS TIME (INSUFFICIENT DEMAND)

Oklahoma has implemented an open vendor model in which the state selects a single vendor while allowing providers to continue using their existing EVV systems as long as it meets federal EVV guidelines. Oklahoma has chosen AuthentiCare as its EVV aggregator.

AxisCare meets state EVV requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management solution. We are also researching an integration with AuthentiCare, which will allow agencies to send specific visit information directly into their system.

Oklahoma Healthcare Authority

Supported: YES

Oregon has chosen an open model in which providers may choose the EVV system that best meets their needs and are not required to use a specific software or vendor as long as the system meets federal requirements.

AxisCare meets all requirements listed within the CURES Act, making it an EVV and management powerhouse for Oregon Home Care Providers.

Oregon Department of Human Services (EVV)

Supported: YES

Pennsylvania has implemented an open model in which the state sets the standards for EVV, and providers may either use their existing EVV system or choose one that best meets their needs.

AxisCare meets state EVV requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management solution. We have also integrated with HHAeXchange and Sandata, Pennsylvania’s two EVV aggregators, which will allow agencies to send specific visit information directly into their systems.

Pennsylvania Department of Human Services

Supported: YES

Rhode Island has chosen to implement an open vendor model in which the state selects a single vendor (in this case, SanData Technologies) while allowing providers to continue using their existing EVV systems as long as it meets federal EVV guidelines.

AxisCare meets state EVV requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management solution. We have also developed an integration with Sandata, Rhode Island’s contracted vendor, which will allow agencies to send specific visit information directly to SanData, if needed.

Rhode Island Executive Office of Heath and Human Services

Supported: UNDETERMINED

South Carolina has not released information regarding their decision on an EVV model, however, it appears that they are leaning towards a closed model approach (state mandates a specific EVV provider). We are closely monitoring South Carolina’s decision and will continue to post updates as they are provided. If you have more information regarding South Carolina’s EVV decision, please contact us.

SOUTH CAROLINA HEALTHY CONNECTIONS MEDICAID SITE

Supported: NOT AT THIS TIME (NO REQUESTS)

South Dakota has chosen a Closed Model, mandating Therap as their EVV aggregator.

We are not integrating with South Dakota’s aggregator at this time as we have not received any integration requests. If the provider determines utilization of the State’s EVV system is not feasible, the provider must request and receive written approval from the State to utilize an alternate EVV system. Read More

ELECTRONIC VISIT VERIFICATION QUESTION AND ANSWER

Supported: NOT AT THIS TIME

Tennessee is working with two vendors to implement EVV. Sandata will be responsible for the implementation for everyone except those who self-direct services in the Self-Determination waiver. Those who self-direct services will use PPL, the current contracted financial supports broker.

AxisCare is currently investigating how we can meet EVV requirements in Tennessee. More information coming soon.

TennCare Website

Supported: NOT AT THIS TIME (INSUFFICIENT DEMAND)

Texas has chosen a Closed Model, mandating DataLogic Vesta as its EVV vendor.

AxisCare is currently investigating integration with Vesta, however, we have not received many requests from agencies in the state. We will continue to post updates here.

TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES EVV

Supported: YES

Utah has chosen an open model in which providers may choose the EVV system that best meets their needs and are not required to use a specific software or vendor as long as the system meets federal requirements.

AxisCare meets all requirements listed within the CURES Act, making it an EVV and management powerhouse for Utah Home Care Providers.

Utah Department of Health – Medicaid

Supported: NOT AT THIS TIME (INSUFFICIENT DEMAND)

Vermont has chosen Sandata Technologies, LLC as their statewide Electronic Visit Verification (EVV) vendor.

We are not integrating with Vermont’s aggregator at this time as we have not received any integration requests. If you are a Vermont agency in need of this integration, please contact us as soon as possible.

Learn More

Department of Vermont Health Access

Supported: YES

Virginia has chosen to use an open vendor model in which the state sets the standards for EVV, and providers may either use their existing EVV system or choose one that best meets their needs.

AxisCare has developed a direct integration with Tellus, Virginia’s EVV aggregator, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management solution.

Supported: NOT AT THIS TIME (INSUFFICIENT DEMAND) 

Washington has chosen to implement an open vendor model in which the state selects a single vendor (in this case, Sandata) while allowing providers to continue using their existing EVV systems as long as it meets federal EVV guidelines.

AxisCare meets state EVV requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management solution. We have also developed an integration with Sandata, Washington’s contracted aggregator, which will allow agencies to send specific visit information directly to their system if needed.

Washington State Department of Social and Health Services – EVV

Supported: NOT AT THIS TIME (INSUFFICIENT DEMAND)

The state of West Virginia has chosen HHAeXchange as their EVV aggregator. AxisCare is considering an integration with HHAeXchange in West Virginia barring sufficient demand from agencies in the state.

WEST VIRGINIA BUREAU FOR MEDICAL SERVICES

Supported: YES

Wisconsin has chosen to implement an open vendor model in which the state selects a single vendor (in this case, SanData Technologies) while allowing providers to continue using their existing EVV systems as long as it meets federal EVV guidelines.

AxisCare meets state EVV requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management solution. We have also developed an integration with Sandata, Wisconsin’s contracted vendor, which will allow agencies to send specific visit information directly to SanData, if needed.

Wisconsin Department of Health Services – EVV

Supported: NOT AT THIS TIME (INSUFFICIENT DEMAND)

Wyoming has selected CareBridge as its EVV aggregator. We are currently awaiting integration specifications from the state and will post updates here as they are provided.

In the meantime, AxisCare meets all mandated system requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management system.

Wyoming Department of Health