Select your state below to see how AxisCare provides an EVV solution for your home care agency.

Disclaimer: As many states are still deciding on their EVV vendor model, we are closely monitoring their decisions and will attempt to keep this page as updated as possible. However, this page may or may not reflect the latest news, so please reference your state’s medicaid site for official information and updates.

The Alabama Medicaid Agency has implemented a specific Electronic Visit Verification and Monitoring (EVVM) system. See their state site for more information.

Alabama Medicaid Information

Alaska plans to adopt the provider choice model, in which agencies select their EVV vendor of choice and self-fund EVV implementation. States set requirements and standards for EVV vendors, including specific data collection requirements.

AxisCare meets all EVV requirements stated in the CURES Act, making it an EVV and management power package for Alaska agencies.

Alaska Department of Health and Social Services

The Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS) has chosen Sandata Technologies, LLC as their statewide Electronic Visit Verification (EVV) vendor.

AxisCare is currently developing an integration with Sandata which is projected to be completed well before the January 2020 implementation deadline.

AHCCCS EVV Update

Arkansas has chosen to use a state-sponsored solution called Careify. However, providers may use their own solution as long as it meets the state’s minimum EVV requirements.

AxisCare meets all EVV requirements stated in the CURES Act, making it an EVV and management power package for Arkansas agencies.

Arkansas EVV Update [Webinar]

California has chosen to use an open model in which the state sets the standards for EVV, and providers and MCOs may either use their existing EVV system or choose one that best meets their needs.

AxisCare meets all EVV requirements stated in the CURES Act, making it an EVV and management power package for California agencies.

California Department of Social Services

Colorado has chosen to implement a hybrid method in which the state selects a single vendor (in this case, Sandata Technologies) while allowing providers and MCOs to continue using their existing EVV systems as long as it meets federal EVV guidelines.

AxisCare meets federal guidelines and is currently developing an integration with Sandata which is projected to be completed well before the January 2020 implementation deadline.

Colorado EVV Information

Connecticut has mandated Sandata Technologies as their EVV vendor. AxisCare is currently developing an integration with Sandata which is projected to be completed well before the January 2020 implementation deadline.

Connecticut EVV Information

Delaware is currently in the process of developing its EVV system. We are closely monitoring Delaware’s decision. If you have any information regarding which vendor(s) Delaware may be leaning towards, please contact us.

Delaware EVV Information

Florida requires the MCOs who manage Medicaid beneficiaries to select and implement an EVV solution of their own choosing. We have included a list of Florida’s major MCOs and their EVV vendors of choice (some are still in the process of choosing) below.

AxisCare currently provides a direct integration with HHAeXchange.

  • EVV Vendor: Tellus LLC (More information coming soon)
    • UnitedHealthcare, Anthem/Simply Healthcare, Aetna, ILS and Community Care Plan
  • EVV Vendor: HHAeXchange
    • Humana, Staywell, Sunshine
Florida’s Agency for Health Care Administration

Georgia has chosen an open vendor EVV approach in which the state can either contract with a single EVV vendor, build their own system for providers to use, or allow the use of other EVV systems. Alternative EVV systems are allowable as long as they meet mandated system and aggregator requirements.

AxisCare meets all mandated system requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management system.

Georgia Department of Community Health

Hawaii’s Med-QUEST Division (MQD) has chosen Sandata Technologies, LLC as their statewide Electronic Visit Verification (EVV) vendor.

AxisCare is currently developing an integration with Sandata which is projected to be completed well before the January 2020 implementation deadline.

Med-QUEST Division (MQD) Update

We are currently monitoring Idaho’s decision on an EVV vendor. If you have more information regarding which EVV vendor Idaho may be leaning towards, please contact us.

Idaho Department of Health and Welfare

Illinois has chosen the open vendor model in which the state selects a single vendor while allowing providers and MCOs to continue using their existing EVV systems. AxisCare meets state EVV requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management solution. We are also developing an integration with Sandata (Illinois’ contracted vendor) which is projected to be completed well before the January 2020 implementation deadline.

Illinois Department of Human Services

Indiana has chosen the open vendor model in which the state selects a single vendor while allowing providers and MCOs to continue using their existing EVV systems. AxisCare meets state EVV requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management solution. We are also developing an integration with Sandata (Indiana’s contracted vendor) which is projected to be completed well before the January 2020 implementation deadline.

Indiana Medicaid Website

Iowa’s IME is working in collaboration with the Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) to develop and implement an EVV program. We are closely monitoring Iowa’s EVV decision.

Iowa Department of Human Services – EVV

Kansas has chosen to mandate a statewide external vendor for EVV. AxisCare is currently investigating an integration with the chosen vendor. More information coming soon.

Kansas Department of Health and Environment

Kentucky is currently in the process of choosing an EVV system. We are closely monitoring Kentucky’s decision. If you have any information regarding which vendor(s) Kentucky may be leaning towards, please contact us.

Department for Medicaid Services

Louisiana has chosen an open model in which the state sets the standards for EVV, and providers and MCOs may either use their existing EVV system or choose one that best meets their needs. The state utilizes a vendor agnostic aggregator system called Louisiana Service Reporting System (LaSRS) to take in data from all EVV systems.

AxisCare meets all mandated system requirements, so providers may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management system.

Louisiana Department of Health – EVV

Maine is developing an open EVV system which will allow home care providers to utilize their own EVV system (i.e. AxisCare) and connect with MIHMS (Maine Integrated Health Management Solutions). More information coming soon.

Maine Department of Health and Human Services – EVV

Maryland operates a state-mandated in-house EVV model in which the state develops, operates, and manages its own EVV system. This is the only information we have at this time. More info will be provided as updates are released.

Maryland Department of Health

Massachusetts currently utilizes MyTimesheets as their EVV vendor. AxisCare is monitoring Massachusetts’ EVV plan and investigating an integration with MyTimesheets. More information will be released soon.

MassHealth – Letter to PCAs

The Michigan Department of Health and Human Services has decided to go with an open system that allows providers with an EVV system the ability to continue using their current system. Providers that currently do not have an EVV system will have the ability to use the state-developed EVV system.

AxisCare meets all state requirements for current users to use as their EVV vendor. 

Michigan Department of Health and Human Services – EVV

The Minnesota Department of Human Services has decided to go with an open system in which the state sets the standards for EVV, and providers and MCOs may either use their existing EVV system or choose one that best meets their needs.

AxisCare meets all state requirements, so users may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV solution.

MN Department of Human Services: Electronic Service Delivery Documentation

Mississippi has not made a final decision regarding EVV. We are closely monitoring their decision. If you have any information regarding which vendor(s) Mississippi may be leaning towards, please contact us.

Mississippi Medicaid

Missouri has opted to pursue an open vendor model, allowing personal care providers to select the EVV vendor which best suits their needs, or to continue to utilize their existing system. AxisCare meets all state requirements as an EVV vendor, so current users can continue using AxisCare as their EVV solution.

Missouri Department of Social Services – EVV

Montana has not made a final decision regarding EVV. We are closely monitoring their decision. If you have any information regarding which vendor(s) Montana may be leaning towards, please contact us.

Montana Medicaid

Nebraska considers its approach to EVV implementation to be an open model under which the State will procure at least one contract for a vendor solution that all providers can utilize, as well as allowing providers to use their own compliant EVV systems, if they choose. A preferred vendor has not yet been chosen.

AxisCare meets all state EVV requirements, making it a management and EVV power house. 

Nebraska Department of Health & Human Services

Nevada has chosen a closed model in which the state requires all providers to use a specific EVV system.

We are currently investigating an integration with the chosen vendor. More information coming soon.

Nevada Department of Health and Human Services – EVV

New Hampshire is currently in the process of developing its EVV system. We are closely monitoring New Hampshire’s system development. If you have any information regarding the new system, please contact us.

New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services

Currently, New Jersey plans to issue a RFP (request for proposal) for an aggregator EVV vendor. Providers will be able to utilize their own electronic systems to send the required data to DHS.

We are closely monitoring New Jersey’s final decision and will post updated information as we receive updates.

New Jersey Department of Human Services

New Mexico has selected a closed model in which the state mandates a specific EVV provider (see their state website for more information).

AxisCare is currently investigating an integration with the chosen vendor. More information coming soon.

Because EVV is already widely in use in New York for agency-based personal care, the state has opted for the provider choice model. This model allows agencies to purchase systems from vendors they select as long as it meets the requirements outlined in the 21st Century Cures Act.

AxisCare meets the requirements outlined by the act, making it a management and EVV power house.

Office of the Medicaid Inspector General

North Carolina is seeking to utilize the Open Vendor Model concept to meet the EVV requirements of the 21st Century Cures Act. The state will maintain oversight and receive funding for implementation of one default EVV vendor while also allowing vendor choice for providers and MCOs who already have an EVV system in place.

AxisCare meets all requirements stated in the 21st Century Cures Act, making it a management and EVV power house.

NC Medicaid Division of Health Benefits

North Dakota held public meetings for providers to submit input on the upcoming EVV implementation. The last meeting occurred June 5, 2018, but the state has not made any announcements since.

AxisCare provides a management and EVV power solution that meets the EVV vendor requirements stated in the 21st Century Cures Act. We are closely monitoring North Dakota’s decision. If you have updated information, please contact us.

North Dakota Department of Human Services

In Ohio, agencies can choose to use the Sandata system or a certified alternative EVV system (like AxisCare).

AxisCare meets all alternate vendor requirements in addition to developing an integration with Sandata, which is projected to be completed well before Phase 2 of implementation (Deadline: August 5, 2019).

Agencies may continue to use AxisCare as their scheduling, management, and EVV solution.

Ohio Provider Resource Association EVV Information

Oklahoma implements a closed EVV model in which the state Medicaid program contracts with a single EVV vendor, and mandates all provider agencies to use that vendor’s EVV system.

The state has not yet chosen its EVV vendor, however, we are closely monitoring their decision. More information will be released soon.

Oklahoma Healthcare Authority

Oregon currently uses eXPRS, which captures a lot of the information required by the 21st Century Cures Act. However, there are limitations to eXPRS which are not currently meeting the EVV requirements. The latest news suggests that they plan to build upon what eXPRS already has in place to meet the federal requirements.

We are monitoring Oregon’s decision and will continue to update you here.

Oregon Department of Human Services (EVV)

Pennsylvania’s three MCOs have selected HHAeXchange as their aggregator system which receives data from all EVV systems.

AxisCare provides an integration that allows you to easily submit your claims directly to HHAeXchange. You will continue to be able to use the AxisCare Mobile App and Telephony to electronically verify your visits.

Pennsylvania Department of Human Services

Rhode Island entered a contract with Sandata in 2016 for a statewide EVV system. Providers do not have a choice to use any other EVV system for time and billing. They may, however, use a different scheduling system if it integrates with and is approved by Sandata.

AxisCare is currently developing an integration with Sandata which is projected to be finished well before the January 2020 implementation deadline. More information will be released soon.

Rhode Island Executive Office of Heath and Human Services

South Carolina has not released information regarding their decision on an EVV model, however, it appears that they are leaning towards a closed model approach (state mandates a specific EVV provider).

We are closely monitoring South Carolina’s decision and will continue to post updates as they are provided. If you have more information regarding South Carolina’s EVV decision, please contact us.

South Carolina Healthy Connections Medicaid Site

South Dakota has selected a closed model in which the state mandates a specific EVV provider (Therap). AxisCare is currently investigating how we can meet requirements in South Dakota. More information coming soon.

Electronic Visit Verification Question and Answer

Tennessee’s MCOs currently select and manage the EVV vendors. However, this will be changing in 2019. The implementation of a new LTSS EVV system has already begun, and AxisCare is currently investigating how we can meet EVV requirements in Tennessee.

TennCare Website

Texas has chosen DataLogic Vesta as its EVV vendor. However, HHSC and TMHP are evaluating potentially increasing the EVV vendor pool to provide new and current providers a choice in selecting an EVV vendor when the additional programs are added. If new EVV vendors are selected, it is anticipated that their services will be available Fall 2019. HHSC and TMHP will provide updates as new information is available. 

AxisCare is currently investigating an integration with Vesta. We will continue to post updates here.

Texas Health and Human Services EVV

Utah has chosen an open model in which the state sets the standards for EVV, and providers and MCOs may either use their existing EVV system or choose one that best meets their needs. The state utilizes an aggregator system to take in data from all EVV systems.

AxisCare meets all requirements listed within the CURES Act, making it an EVV and management power house for Utah Home Care Providers.

Utah Department of Health – Medicaid

Vermont has chosen an open model in which the state sets the standards for EVV, and providers and MCOs may either use their existing EVV system or choose one that best meets their needs. The state utilizes an aggregator system to take in data from all EVV systems.

AxisCare meets all mandated system requirements, so providers in Vermont may continue to use AxisCare as their EVV and management system.

Department of Vermont Health Access

Virginia currently plans to implement a provider choice model in which the state sets the standards for EVV, and providers must choose and implement an EVV system that works for them by the deadline of January 2020.

AxisCare meets all state requirements, so providers may choose or continue to use AxisCare as their management and EVV solution in Virginia.

Washington state is working on a phased implementation and demonstration of a good faith effort to comply with the EVV requirements. Each Home Care Agency will select their EVV vendor to process the EVV and Claims data for their workers. The EVV vendor must meet requirements stated within by the CURES Act.

AxisCare meets all requirements stated in the 21st Century Cures Act, making it a management and EVV power house. 

Washington State Department of Social and Health Services – EVV
West Virginia plans to contract with a single EVV vendor. The model involves the State procuring, funding, selecting and implementing an EVV solution of their choice and managing the concerns and complaints from providers.
The state has not yet chosen a vendor, however, AxisCare is monitoring their decision closely. If you have any information regarding West Virginia’s EVV vendor decision, please contact us.
West Virginia Bureau for Medical Services

In Wisconsin, DHS vendor Sandata will provide an EVV system to be used by impacted providers. DHS is considering the use of Sandata’s aggregator technology. If used, this technology would allow providers who already have an EVV system to continue to use it if it meets EVV requirements.

AxisCare is currently developing an integration with Sandata, which is projected to be finished well before the January 2020 deadline. More information coming soon.

Wisconsin Department of Health Services – EVV

Wyoming is currently in the process of developing its EVV model. We are closely monitoring Wyoming’s decision. If you have any information regarding which vendor(s) Wyoming may be leaning towards, please contact us.

Wyoming Department of Health